Executive summary
What can a consumer verify before first contact?
The accepted public record is strongest at basic source visibility and weakest where a consumer needs provider-level review dates, practitioner credential context, or a direct path to the exact service being considered.
- Public credential evidence is visible on 25 of 351 profiles.
- 53 of 2877 service assertions link to an exact provider destination.
- Provider-level review dates are not recorded on any of 351 profiles.
- Provider Website contributes 691 of 800 unique source records.
- 60 of 351 profiles link to a permanent claim-level Trust Passport.
These are publication and evidence-visibility measures. They are not provider rankings, clinical-quality claims, medical advice, or a composite trust score.
Six media-ready figures
The public record, measure by measure
Every figure includes its denominator, cutoff, source note, accessible table, and downloadable SVG.
Public credential evidence is visible on 25 of 351 profiles
A separately admitted public credential overlay makes practitioner evidence inspectable on the profile. Absence does not establish a credential problem.
Download SVG
View chart data
| Measure | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Public credential overlay | 25 | 7% |
| No public credential overlay | 326 | 93% |
53 of 2877 service assertions link to an exact provider destination
Exact destinations help a reader confirm a specific service on a provider-owned page instead of relying on a generic home page.
Download SVG
View chart data
| Measure | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Exact service destination | 53 | 2% |
| No exact destination | 2,824 | 98% |
Provider-level review dates are not recorded on any of 351 profiles
The measure uses only a provider-level date in the accepted snapshot. It does not substitute a source capture date or infer freshness.
Download SVG
View chart data
| Measure | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Review date recorded | 0 | 0% |
| Review date not recorded | 351 | 100% |
Provider Website contributes 691 of 800 unique source records
The mix shows which public source types support the accepted aggregate. Records are deduplicated by public URL and accepted content hash.
Download SVG
View chart data
| Measure | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Provider Website | 691 | 86% |
| Provider Authorized Booking | 102 | 13% |
| Official Registry | 7 | 1% |
60 of 351 profiles link to a permanent claim-level Trust Passport
A Trust Passport preserves a public claim record with stable identity and version history. It is not a provider-wide quality rating.
Download SVG
View chart data
| Measure | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| At least one Trust Passport | 60 | 17% |
| No Trust Passport | 291 | 83% |
351 of 351 profiles publish at least one visible source
Visible-source coverage is Treomark publication proof. It does not mean every provider claim or the provider as a whole has been verified.
Download SVG
View chart data
| Measure | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| At least one visible source | 351 | 100% |
| No visible source | 0 | 0% |
Measure definitions
How to read the aggregate
Values count accepted public records exactly as published. A missing field is not converted into a provider judgment, and unavailable operational series are not reported as zero.
Published provider locations
Indexable South Florida location profiles in the accepted public dataset.
Qualified city/service collections
Canonical collections that pass the current evidence and usefulness gates.
Profiles with visible sources
Profiles that publish at least one inspectable source record.
Service assertions with sources
Published service assertions connected to at least one visible source.
Profiles with provider-level review dates
Profiles whose accepted snapshot contains a provider-level review date.
Profiles with public credential evidence
Profiles publishing a separately admitted practitioner credential overlay.
Profiles with Trust Passports
Profiles linked to at least one permanent claim-level evidence record.
Trust Passport records
Permanent public claim records in the accepted export.
Claimed profiles
Locations connected to an approved provider account for ongoing stewardship.
Published service assertions
Accepted location-service assertions, counted by exact accepted service slug.
Published facts
Address, contact, hours, and other non-service facts in accepted profiles.
Unique source records
Distinct source captures after URL and content-hash deduplication.
Exact accepted service destinations
Provider-owned exact service destinations currently active in the public overlay.
Public practitioner records
Source-gated practitioner records in the accepted public credential overlays.
Public practitioner NPI records
Practitioner records with an exact accepted public NPPES identity.
Field-level data dictionary
The aggregate CSV uses a long-form structure so metrics and breakdowns can share one stable file.
Download dictionary CSV| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
| section | Metric or named breakdown family. |
| id | Stable machine identifier for the measure or category. |
| label | Human-readable measure or category name. |
| value | Accepted aggregate count for the row. |
| denominator | Comparison universe when the measure is a rate. |
| definition | Plain-language scope of the measure. |
| data_through | Latest authoritative accepted input date. |
| edition_id | Checksum-bound immutable edition identity. |
| method_version | Version of the aggregate calculation method. |
Research assets
Download, cite, and reuse
No download contains raw third-party captures or unsupported underlying evidence.
Edition history
A stable canonical report with immutable data editions
The editorial report remains at this URL. The current aggregate has edition ID
2026-08-13-method-3-0-a91c2587f901 and SHA-256 checksum a91c2587f9015e5ec2e7a37bb096bb93da4e266e8babaff0bb2ae3d4814d195f.
The comparison to 2026-08-10-method-2-0-8a5a709d8d14 is
not method-compatible.
Non-compatible continuity measures remain unavailable instead of being inferred.
Known limitations
What the Index does not establish
- Counts describe Treomark's accepted public dataset, not every provider in South Florida.
- A source-backed service assertion is not provider verification, a clinical-quality rating, or an endorsement.
- Provider-level freshness is reported as not recorded when the accepted snapshot has no review date; source capture dates are not substituted.
- Service cuts use exact accepted service slugs and do not silently merge aliases.
- Commercial relationships do not change inclusion, evidence, verification, ranking, or these calculations.
- Unresolved hours/location conflicts and correction-response times are labeled not measured rather than reported as zero.
- Edition deltas are descriptive accepted-data changes and do not establish provider performance, authority, or causality.
Reuse and license terms
Treomark-generated aggregate tables and charts may be copied, shared, and adapted, including for commercial use, with attribution. Preserve the edition, method, cutoff, and limitations; do not imply Treomark endorsement. Third-party source content and marks are not licensed by this permission.
Suggested citation
Treomark Research. “Treomark South Florida Provider Transparency Index.” August 2026 edition, method v3.0, data through 2026-08-13. Treomark, https://treomark.com/research/south-florida-transparency/. Edition 2026-08-13-method-3-0-a91c2587f901.Download citation